Showing posts with label outfront seattle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label outfront seattle. Show all posts

Thursday, February 21, 2008

National News: Task Force decries anti-gay bigotry involving teen shot in hate-laced attack

WASHINGTON, Feb. 14 — Lawrence King, a 15-year-old student in Oxnard, Calif., was shot in the head yesterday by a classmate. King was declared brain dead, but his body remains on a ventilator for possible organ donation. According to the Associated Press, the Ventura County prosecutor has filed charges of attempted murder with a hate-crime enhancement, but can't discuss the facts behind the case.

Statement by Matt Foreman, Executive Director National Gay and Lesbian Task Force

“Right now we don’t know exactly how anti-gay hate expressed itself in the murder of Lawrence King. What we do know is that he was harassed on a daily basis because of his sexual orientation and gender expression. We do know that adults at his junior high school did not stop it and that kind of tolerance of anti-gay bigotry is pervasive in our nation’s schools. Our hearts go out to Lawrence’s family — and to all young lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender kids who are — right now, right this minute — being bullied and beaten in school while adults look the other way.”

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

National News: State Department drops ban on HIV-positive diplomats

State Department drops ban on HIV-positive diplomats
By Matthew Lee, Associated Press February 18, 2008

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Under pressure from a lawsuit, the State Department is
changing rules that had disqualified HIV-positive people from becoming U.S.
diplomats.

Effective Friday, the department removed HIV from a list of medical
conditions that automatically prevent foreign service candidates from
meeting an employment requirement that they be able to work anywhere in the
world.

The change was made after consultation with medical experts and in response
to a lawsuit filed by an HIV-positive man who was denied entry into the
foreign service despite being otherwise qualified, the department said..

Prospective diplomats with HIV will now be considered for the foreign
service on a case-by-case basis, along with those with other designated
ailments like cancer to determine if they meet the "worldwide availability"
standard, it said.

Officials denied that the policy had ever intentionally discriminated
against HIV-positive people and noted that the policy had applied only to
incoming diplomats, not those who had contracted the virus or other
diseases while in the foreign service.

"We have a policy requiring that all foreign service officers be worldwide
available as determined by a medical examination at the time of entry into
the foreign service," said Gonzalo Gallegos, a State Department spokesman.
"That has not changed."

The department's chief medical officer had "revised its medical clearance
guidelines on HIV based on advances in HIV care and treatment and
consultations with medical experts," Gallegos said. "The new clearance
guidelines provide that HIV-positive individuals may be deemed worldwide
available if certain medical conditions are met."

The decision was hailed by Lambda Legal, a New York-based group that
advocates for the civil rights of homosexuals, bisexuals, transgender
people and those with HIV and represented the plaintiff in the lawsuit
against the State Department.

"The new guidelines mean that candidates for Foreign Service posts who have
HIV will now be assessed on a case-by-case basis, as the law requires,"
said Bebe Anderson, the organization's HIV project director. "At long last,
the State Department is taking down its sign that read, 'People with HIV
need not apply.'"

The change in policy came less than two weeks before the trial in the
lawsuit brought in 2003 by Lorenzo Taylor, a trilingual international
affairs specialist who passed the difficult foreign service application
process but was rejected after he told the department of his HIV status.

"Now people like me who apply to the Foreign Service will not have to go
through what I did," Taylor said in a statement. "They and others with HIV
will know that they do not have to surrender to stigma, ignorance, fear or
the efforts of anyone, even the federal government, to impose second-class
citizenship on them. They can fight back."

Lambda Legal said the suit had been settled "partly due to the new
guidelines," but the State Department said the policy switch was not part
of the settlement.

"The change simply reflects medical advances in the area of HIV care and
maintenance," Gallegos said.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press.

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Action: AI on Iran

In May 2007, two men were tried and convicted of abduction, rape and theft. They were sentenced to being “thrown at a height” or “cliff” (partab az bolandi) by a judge in Shiraz, Fars province, southern Iran. Four other men, allegedly also involved in the crimes, were ordered to endure 100 lashes each. Both of these punishments have not yet been carried out by the Iranian authorities.

On 2 January 2008, Qods, a national daily newspaper in Iran, reported that the sentences of the two men had been confirmed by the Supreme Court, and sent for implementation, and that four other men had been convicted by Branch 2 of the Fars Criminal Court to 100 lashes each, in connection with the same case. The six men were accused of having abducted two young men in the city of Arsanjan, to the east of Shiraz, whom they harassed and whose property they stole before allegedly raping them.

At a press conference on 15 January, Ali Reza Jamshidi, the Spokesman for the Judiciary in Iran, confirmed that the sentences had been upheld by the Supreme Court, but that they had not yet been carried out. His statement appeared to contradict the Qods article, as it suggested that the Head of the Judiciary may not yet have given final approval for the executions. All death sentences in Iran must be approved by the Head of the Judiciary before they can be carried out. He has the power to suspend the execution.

Iran’s Penal Code states in Article 109 that both men involved in same-sex penetrative (anal) or non-penetrative sex will be punished. Article 110 states that those convicted of engaging in anal sex will be executed and that the manner of execution is at the discretion of the judge. Article 111 states that both will be executed “provided both the active and passive parties are mature, sane and consenting”. There is no separate legislation dealing with rape. Article 14 of the Directive on Implementation Regulations for Sentences of Retribution in kind, Stoning, Murder, Crucifixion, Death Penalty and Flogging states that death may be carried out by hanging, firing squad, electrocution or another method determined by the judge issuing the verdict. If no other method is specified, the method will be hanging. The sentence passed in this case is exceptional in its apparent intent to inflict suffering.

The sentence was condemned by the Centre for Human Rights Defenders, a Tehran-based human rights NGO whose members include Nobel laureate Shirin Ebadi.

In 2007, at least 312 people, including child offenders, were executed in Iran, although the true figure may be considerably higher. Amnesty International acknowledges the right and responsibility of governments to bring to justice those suspected of criminal offences but is unconditionally opposed to the use of the death penalty and opposes the use of flogging and other judicial corporal punishments which constitute torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment.

Take Action Here

Saturday, January 26, 2008

International News: South Korea's Liberal LGBT Policies Regress

The president of South Korea, Mr. Lee Myung-bak, has become a critic of the country's past LGBT policies. Mr. Lee Myung -bak is now listening to anti-LGBT activists and changing policy with his new Anti-Discrimination Bill.

Here is IGLHRC'S overview on the bill and issue:

Overview

South Korea’s policies on LGBTQ issues have
been relatively progressive. The country
prohibited employment discrimination based on
sexual orientation in 2001, and permitted people
who had undergone gender reassignment surgery
to get personal documents reflecting their
changed gender identity in 2006. But
homophobia persists and LGBTQ activists
continue to fight discrimination in schools and in
the military. Many gay websites remain
censored.

The country’s LGBTQ movement is currently
strategizing about how to stall a negative
decision on the proposed anti-discrimination bill,
which, in its most recent draft, eliminates seven
protected categories including sexual orientation.
The LGBTQ movement is also contemplating
how to weather the next five years under the
administration of newly elected ultra-
conservative President, Mr. Lee Myung-bak.

---------------------------------------------------------
Here is the link to the full report: http://www.iglhrc.org/files/iglhrc/program_docs/Regional%20Update-Korea.pdf